On Sunday, January 27, The New York Times featured a story, “Selling
a New Generation on Guns,” that provided an exposé on the efforts of the firearms
industry to introduce guns to children. Why would we encourage this? The use of
guns requires not only some basic skills, but because of the lethality of the
gun, it also requires some discretion. The developmental capacity of most
children and adolescents to responsibly use a firearm is greatly diminished
because of their age and any number of factors that make placing a gun in the hands
of children inconceivable to me.
Recently, I was involved in a discussion involving one of our adolescent
residents who had been introduced to guns by his father on a recent home visit.
Although we were not concerned that the boy would have a gun in his possession,
we were concerned that he did not possess the self-control or reasoning
capacity to assure that he could use a gun appropriately. With proper support,
this resident has increasingly seen his ability to manage anger and impulses. But
until he is able to master these issues, providing him with access to firearms
is not advised. Luckily our staff had enough of a rapport with both parent and
child that we were able to address the issue and identify ways to bond other than
at the shooting range.
Some would say that restricting access to guns for children is only common
sense. It does not require any additional legislation; it just requires that we
take responsibility for safeguarding our children as we do with so many other
things. However, parents and families need to be supported in their efforts;
and an environment that encourages access to guns for children can undermine
the efforts of any well-intended parent.
What concerns me about the strategy that is being employed by the
firearms industry is the insidious way recreational shooting is introduced into
the lives of children. The firearms industry has demonstrated little consideration
of the children’s ability to understand the potential for deadly impact of the
sport.