Having directed residential treatment facilities for very vulnerable children for almost 25 years, I agree with
Banks. However, the need for residential care still exists as part of an array
of services required to effectively treat children who have been traumatized.
Recently, I recall speaking to
the father of a resident who described to me the powerlessness that he felt to adequately
address the needs of his teenage son. The adolescent’s defiance and outbursts
had disrupted the family. After many less intrusive attempts to provide care,
the family was left with little recourse, but to consider residential
treatment. Hillsides has been a real resource for this family as they hope for
the reunification of their son soon.
There are many reasons to
consider residential treatment. For some of our residents, the failure of their
families to provide an adequate and safe environment prompts the placement. For
others, extraordinary developmental or learning challenges lead to residential
treatment. For all residents, trauma of one sort or another is at the root of
the care they require.
More and more families are
effectively engaged, allowing well
over 85% of those children we serve in our residential treatment program to
return home, experience success, and enjoy their childhood.
So to address the opening
question posed by Sandy Banks, would you drop your child off at a residential
treatment center? Perhaps the answer is, “only if absolutely necessary.” It is
an important question to address for us who, one way or another, provide
services for children removed from their homes. The only way that care can be
effective is if indeed the children are treated as one of our own.
I often remind staff that
separation is a considerable hardship that our residents and their families
experience. So, with that in mind, our responsibility is to ease that burden by
providing the absolute highest quality care we can offer.
No comments:
Post a Comment