The election is down to the
wire and political pundits have focused on the upcoming presidential debates as
critical to the success of either candidate. As I watch the debates, I’ll be
looking for questions that address the issues of vulnerable children, youth,
and their families-- questions that might indicate the candidate’s position
regarding education, children’s services, youth development, family supportive
services, and poverty. The candidates may be wise to avoid specifics, but somehow
their response to these issues may provide us with a glimpse into how they
might lead.
The overriding issue impacting
the vast majority of those we serve is poverty. The US Census Bureau statistics
released in September indicate that 6.4 million Californians, almost 17% of the
state’s population, are living in poverty. The impact of these numbers on
children is frightening. While individuals under 18 account for only one
quarter of the state’s residents, they account for one-third of Californians
living in poverty!
There is no question we are
living through an unprecedented time of financial challenges as a nation. No
candidate can venture to offer assurances without running the risk of
miscalculating the Herculean task of stabilizing the country financially. However,
the issue of poverty and its long-term impact are essential parts of how we
develop a path that leads the country through this challenging time.
From lower levels of
educational attainment to lower earnings as adults, the lasting consequences
are significant for children who grow up in poverty. The impact is not only
felt by the individual raised in poverty, but the significant cost imposed upon
communities and systems left to assist those who have been affected by poverty.
It is a pervasive problem we struggle with, and there are no simple answers.
Clearly, if the debates are
meant to provide an opportunity for a serious discussion on issues that have a
significant impact on our society, I will expect poverty somehow will be
addressed. This is not about two very different philosophical approaches to the
issue, but importantly, it is about the impact these positions have on those
struggling in the grip of poverty.
Each year our Family Center
programs offer assistance to those families who need help with food, lodging,
and transportation, some of the basic needs to get them beyond crisis and
trauma to receive necessary treatment. For those we serve who are struggling,
how these candidates address poverty is not a matter of political posturing,
but rather one of survival. Let’s see what the candidates have to say.
Yes a lot has changed since I was a youngling there in the cottages. It's strange, even then I knew that the obvious way to avoid what we've gotten ourselves into is to not overpopulate--so I've been careful never to create offspring, doing my small, inadequate part. It's sad that in the end humans are just like any other animal, completely unable to act in its own best interest for the long term.
ReplyDelete